MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094916598 · doi:10.1061/9780784413357.058

Rehabilitation of the Duck Bridge

2014· article· en· W2094916598 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jason C. Varney, S. D. Daniel Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures Congress 2014 · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMassachusetts Department of TransportationAGE-WELL
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)TrussTruss bridgeEngineeringSuperstructureSpan (engineering)RehabilitationIntersection (aeronautics)SubstructureForensic engineeringBeam bridgeCivil engineeringStructural engineeringTransport engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Duck Bridge is a five-span, double-intersection, Warren-type through-truss bridge carrying Union Street over the Merrimack River in Lawrence, Massachusetts. Constructed in 1888 by Boston Bridge Works (Cambridge, MA), it is the oldest of its type in the state of Massachusetts. The structure underwent a $15.6M rehabilitation between September 2008 and March 2013, during which components of the substructure and superstructure were repaired or replaced. While the rehabilitation project was driven by the need to address safety concerns from structural deficiencies found in the bridge superstructure, it was important to maintain the historic nature of the truss bridge. The Duck Bridge has long been a significant part of the surrounding community, past and present. It is one of the primary features of the North Canal Historic District, which was added to the National Register of Historic Places in 1984.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStructures Congress 2014Same topicStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207