MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094931334 · doi:10.1353/anq.2011.0023

The Politics of the Dang'an: Spectralization, Spatialization, and Neoliberal Governmentality in China

2011· article· en· W2094931334 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jie Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropological Quarterly · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsGovernmentalitySpatializationContext (archaeology)ChinaTemporalityNeoliberalism (international relations)Class consciousnessCapital (architecture)SocialismSociologyCorporate governanceAuthoritarianismPoliticsPolitical economyEconomic systemPolitical scienceDemocracyCommunismEconomicsHistoryLawAnthropologyPhilosophyManagementEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This essay examines the dang'an system and its post-Mao transformation in order to explore China's recent neoliberal governance. The transformation of the dang'an from a mode of socialist control to a mechanism for enacting market economy serves to spectralize (reduce and derive) Maoist socialism for entrepreneurial capital. Such revisions have also given rise to new forms of spatialization, which reduce workers' consciousness of class and historical temporality and sustain stability. The dang'an and its revisions illustrate how authoritarian and illiberal measures are tinkered into neoliberal technologies in a postsocialist context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.011
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropological QuarterlySame topicChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207