MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094932000 · doi:10.1063/1.1332795

Crystal field, phonon coupling and emission shift of Mn2+ in ZnS:Mn nanoparticles

2001· article· en· W2094932000 on OpenAlexafffund
Wei Chen, Ramaswami Sammynaiken, Yining Huang, Jan‐Olle Malm, Reine Wallenberg, Jan‐Olov Bovin, Valéry Zwiller, Nicholas A. Kotov

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsStillwater (Canada)Western University
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaVetenskapsrådet
KeywordsNanoparticleMaterials scienceCrystal (programming language)Coupling (piping)PhononBlueshiftParticle sizeWavelengthCondensed matter physicsNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsPhotoluminescenceChemistryPhysical chemistryPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Mn2+ emission wavelengths are at 591, 588, 581 and 570 nm, respectively, for the ∼10, ∼4.5, ∼3.5 nm sized nanoparticles and the ZnS:Mn nanoparticles formed in an ultrastable zeolite-Y. To reveal the cause for the shift, the crystal field and phonon coupling were investigated. The results show that the predominant factor for the shift is the phonon coupling, whose strength is size dependent and is determined by both the size confinement and the surface modification of the nanoparticles. Although the crystal field strength decreases with the decreasing of the particle size, its change has little contribution to the emission shift of Mn2+ in ZnS:Mn nanoparticles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations193
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207