Bibliographic record
Abstract
A time-dependent approach to study phase control over molecular photoabsorption, provided by intense laser pulses, is elaborate. The method allows for the decay linewidth of molecular states and frequency bandwidth of the controlling laser field, and can be applied in weak and strong laser fields where the perturbation theory is invalid. It is shown that a frequency mismatch between the fundamental laser wave and its third harmonic can destroy control. For the example of the one-photon versus three-photon control a simple picture of interference from two monochromatic absorption pathways is not enough to explain phase control and one needs to consider a nonlinear temporal interference of multiquantum transitions. In the perturbation-theory limit an elegant generalization of the famous Shapiro-Hepburn-Brumer equation for the one-photon versus three-photon control is derived. Various numerical calculations illustrate the dependence of phase control on molecular linewidth, fundamental laser wavelength, pulse duration, and peak intensity. It is obtained, that the one-photon versus three-photon control is productive if the molecular state populations, individually produced by each laser wave, have beats of approximately the same frequency. The calculations demonstrate that an enough intense optical pulse can suppress molecular decay and may be used in order to keep stable the state population of a decaying molecule for a long time. The available experimental results for the one-photon versus three-photon control over simple and large polyatomic molecules are analyzed and recommendations for the experimental improvement of control are formulated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".