MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094936138 · doi:10.1039/c1fd00095k

Coherently-controlled two-dimensional spectroscopy: Evidence for phase induced long-lived memory effects

2011· article· en· W2094936138 on OpenAlexaff
Valentyn I. Prokhorenko, Alexei Halpin, R. J. Dwayne Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueFaraday Discussions · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronUniversität HamburgMax-Planck-Gesellschaft
KeywordsExcitationModulation (music)SpectroscopyPopulationPhase (matter)Atomic physicsPhase modulationMolecular physicsChemistryMaterials sciencePhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using low-intensity phase-shaped excitation pulses we used two-dimensional (2D) electronic spectroscopy to follow the time dependence of the coherent correlations imposed on a solvated organic dye (Rhodamine 101 in methanol) at room temperature. Shaping of the excitation pulses strongly affects both the real and imaginary parts of the 2D-spectra, especially at small waiting times. In particular, the periodic phase modulation of the excitation pulses appears as a two-dimensional grid-like modulation in the correlation spectrum corresponding to the waiting time T = 0. By increasing the waiting time, this modulation quickly disappears in omega(t) space. However, it is still present in w, space even at very long waiting times (> or = 80 ps) where the inhomogeneous broadening is significantly reduced, and reaches its stationary value of approximately 16%. The resonant nature of this induced modulation at long waiting time allows us to conclude that phase shaping of the excitation induces a long-lived memory in solvated organic dyes that is associated with coherent population transfer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFaraday DiscussionsSame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207