MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094950200 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v63i4.937

Asynchronous Validation and Documentation of Sterile Compounding in a Hospital Pharmacy

2010· article· en· W2094950200 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Denis Lebel, Maxime Thibault, Jean‐François Bussières

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSafe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompoundingDocumentationPharmacyMedicineAsynchronous communicationClinical pharmacyFamily medicineComputer scienceNursingTelecommunicationsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The US Pharmacopeial Convention published the USP Guidebook to Pharmaceutical Compounding— Sterile Preparations in 2008. This publication, which is based on the USP Revised General Chapter , sets practice standards to help ensure that compounded sterile preparations are of high quality. Although these guidelines have not yet been enforced by the Quebec regulatory authority, they will be the basis of revised guidelines to be published in 2011 by l’Ordre des pharmaciens du Quebec. The release of the USP Revised General Chapter is prompting pharmacists and technicians to substantially revise their practice to reduce potential contamination, to limit access to the sterile zone whenever possible, and to appropriately document all steps of the compounding process. In our institution, pharmacy technicians prepare sterile products several times a day. Each of these products must be verified by a pharmacist, which entails the pharmacists entering and exiting the clean room repeatedly, in addition to carrying out their other duties. This time-consuming practice increases the risk of microbiological and particulate contamination. Furthermore, each visual inspection performed in the clean room interrupts the workflow of both the pharmacist and the technician. Interruptions and distractions are a documented cause of medication errors in pharmacies. Traditionally, telepharmacy has been defined as the use of various telecommunications systems to provide pharmaceutical services and care to remote or rural areas or to provide such services during times when pharmacists are not readily available on site (e.g., at night). When the photographic system described in the current article was being developed, there were no published reports on the use of cameras as an aid during sterile compounding. We analyzed our procedures and set the following objectives: (1) to develop an asynchronous workflow that would reduce interruptions (and thereby reduce the risk of medication errors) and (2) to develop a technological solution that would enable pharmacy technicians to capture images of the various steps in preparing medications, which would in turn allow the pharmacist to asynchronously verify the accuracy of the pharmaceutical ingredients, materials, and quantities and would serve as documentation for subsequent reference. This article describes the development, implementation, and use of a photographic system that allows pharmacists to supervise and document the activities of pharmacy technicians according to a time-delayed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital PharmacySame topicSafe Handling of Antineoplastic DrugsFrench-language works237,207