Platelet factor V New York: A defect in factor V distinct from that in factor V Quebec resulting in impaired prothrombinase generation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies were performed on a patient with a longstanding bleeding disorder whose major defects were impaired platelet prothrombinase activity in the absence of added factor Va, and a platelet factor V value that was either decreased or at the lower limit of normal when assayed on multiple occasions. In contrast, plasma factor V values were consistently normal. Unlike Scott Syndrome, in which platelet prothrombinase activity is decreased in both the presence and absence of added factor V, her platelets appeared to utilize added factor Va normally in supporting the generation of prothrombinase activity. These findings suggest an intrinsic defect in platelet factor V as the basis of her platelet prothrombinase defect. This defect appears to be different than that described in the Quebec platelet disorder (factor V Quebec). Immunoblot analyses of washed platelet lysates demonstrated a pattern of variably sized factor V molecules that was entirely similar to that observed in normal platelets, and both the heavy and light chains of her factor V after thrombin cleavage were of the same size as that observed in normal platelets. In addition, her platelet multimerin was normal and immunoblot analysis excluded the type of generalized granular protein defect and pathological proteolysis that has been suggested to explain the factor V defect in the Quebec platelet disorder. The findings in this patient thus suggest a new type of platelet factor V defect as the basis for the impaired capacity of her activated platelets to support prothrombinase generation. The findings further support an important role for platelet factor V in hemostasis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".