Basin Framework and Basement Structuring of Lower Benue Trough, West Africa based on Regional Magnetic Field Data: Tectonic and Hydrocarbon Implications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Results from magnetic field modelling of the Lower Benue Trough, West Africa revealed thick sedimentation with maximum values in the neigbourhood of 7,000m-10,000m. This is in contrast to the average value of 5000m suggested by earlier studies. The thick sedimentation represent thermal sag which is a regional post-rift subsidence associated with West and Central Africa rift systems. N-S, NNW-SSE and E-W structural fabrics interpreted from the transformed magnetic data bound the trough. The subsurface magnetic models also revealed extended graben structures that form the major depoceters that are segmented by intrarift horsts and average crustal thickness of 22km. The qualitative interpretation comprising, analytic signal, directional derivatives and wavelength filtering in frequency domain and subsurface magnetic modelling show that the rift architecture/geometry is controlled by high angle faults and some sinistral transtensional movements that are predominant in the Benue rift system. The low mean anisotropic susceptibility (kb = -6.7x10-4 SI) correlating with the directional horizontal derivative (dy) of the magnetic field conform with the sinistral movement in the trough indicating that magnetic anomalies align themselves along fractures/faults/shear zones owing to their variations in physical properties. The characteristics/patterns of the magnetic anomaly wavelength and inferred results from earlier studies on geophysical potential field methods, geological investigation and physical parameters (susceptibility and remanence) obtained from the subsurface magnetic modelling are pointers to non-magmatic origin of the Lower Benue Trough. The basement structuring, basin framework and predominance of anisotropic susceptibilities (ka, kb and kc) in three orthogonal directions and remanence suggest tectonic setting in the trough due to Early Cretaceous opening of the South Atlantic Ocean and interplate movement in Africa. The grabens, half grabens, faults and deep sedimentation (depocenters) interpreted from the magnetic data are hydrocarbon related structural features.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".