Fatty acids in forages. I. Factors affecting concentrations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
When forages represent a high proportion of ruminant diets they provide a significant quantity of fatty acids (FA). Effects of growth stage, fertilization, conservation method, growth period, species, and cultivar on forage FA were determined in four experiments. Concentrations of C16:0, C18:2, C18:3, and total FA (TFA) in timothy (Phleum pratense L.) decreased (P < 0.01), respectively, by 15, 16, 31, and 23% between stem elongation and early flowering. Nitrogen fertilization (120 vs. 0 kg N ha -1 ) caused an increase (P < 0.01) of 18% of C16:0, 12% of C18:2, 40% of C18:3, and 26% of TFA concentrations. Phosphorus was not deficient and P fertilization (45 vs. 0 kg P ha -1 ) had no significant effect on timothy FA concentrations. Wilting and drying decreased (P < 0.01) timothy C18:2, C18:3, and TFA concentrations. Concentrations of C18:2, C18:3, and TFA were higher in summer regrowth than in spring growth, primarily in orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) and timothy (P < 0.01). Significant variation for all FA concentrations was observed among 12 species (P < 0.05); on average, the C18:3, C18:2, and C16:0 accounted for 88% of TFA in studied species. Timothy was the only species in which the difference among cultivars was simultaneously significant (P < 0.05) for concentrations of C18:2, C18:3, and TFA. Among the grasses, an annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) cultivar had the highest C18:3 concentration (20.6 mg g -1 DM) whereas a timothy cultivar had the lowest (7.3 mg g -1 DM) (P < 0.05). Among legumes, a white clover (Trifolium repens L.) cultivar had the highest C18:3 concentration (16.5 mg g -1 DM) whereas an alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cultivar had the lowest (6.0 mg g -1 DM) (P < 0.05). Polyunsaturated FA concentrations in forages can be increased by harvesting timothy at an early stage of development and as fresh grass, by increasing N fertilization of timothy, and by choosing species with higher FA concentrations such as white clover and annual ryegrass. Key words: Fatty acids, forages, species, cultivar, growth stage, conservation methods
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".