MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094965447 · doi:10.1080/03601270252801373

TEACHING GRADUATE STUDENTS ABOUT METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN RESEARCH ON AGING AND HEALTH

2002· article· en· W2094965447 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Angela Colantonio, Cheryl Cott, V. Marshall, Debbie Laliberté Rudman, Fiona J. Aiken, David G. Hebert, Steven J. R. Underhill

Bibliographic record

VenueEducational Gerontology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAging and Gerontology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGraduate studentsGraduate educationMedical educationCourse (navigation)PsychologyPedagogyMedicineEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a summary of an innovative interdisciplinary course on methodological issues in research on aging and health for graduate students. This paper describes the development and final course outline of a graduate course. The development of this project initially involved a survey of individuals active in gerontological education in both the U.S. and Canada, literature review, and input from course participants. Included is a description of a graduate course that could serve as a template for a similar course elsewhere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.483
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.813
GPT teacher head0.680
Teacher spread0.133 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEducational GerontologySame topicAging and Gerontology ResearchFrench-language works237,207