MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Characteristics of Gas Transport within Uniaxial Compression of Granite Sample

2012· article· en· W2094996101 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chun Guang Wang, Chao‐Jun Li, Hu Xueqiang, Bingqian Li

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced materials research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGeologyCompression (physics)Geotechnical engineeringDeformation (meteorology)Rock mass classificationSuctionFlow (mathematics)Pore water pressureMaterials scienceMineralogyComposite materialMechanicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The physical processes triggering the fluid flow within the stressed rock are highly complex and not fully understood. The granite sample obtained from Creighton mine, Canada, was subjected to the temperature-pressure effects using a special rock mechanic testing machine equipped with a high precision gas monitor. It is shown that when the sample approached to the peak stress during the uniaxial compression test, the connective cracks instantaneously occurred accompanied by a swarm of AE activities, which suddenly decrease the fluid pore pressure. This change can be able to drive the gas back to the newly emerging crack due to the formation of gas pressure gradient within the damage zones. It is indicated that the different permeabilities among the zones can dominate the suction-exhaust proceeding of pore fluids within rock mass. Beyond the volumetric strain at null, the deformation of the stressed rock leads to a reversely change in pore pressure of closed pores. The feature for the gas emission determined by the changes in pore structure of rock is also discussed and analyzed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced materials researchSame topicRock Mechanics and ModelingFrench-language works237,207