Adhesion and detachment mechanisms of sugar surfaces from the solid (glassy) to liquid (viscous) states
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The viscosity of some sugars varies continuously by approximately 10 orders of magnitude over a temperature range of 50 degrees C. Sugars are therefore ideal model materials for studying the failure mechanism of materials as they change from the solid to the liquid state. We have used a surface forces apparatus coupled to interference and optical microscopy imaging to study the way two sugar surfaces adhere and detach from adhesive contact. The sugar-coated layers on mica displayed significant loading-unloading hysteresis, and the adhesive strength and failure mechanism during a "loading-unloading cycle" depended on the loading rate, contact time, and unloading rate. The failure of two glassy sugar surfaces was manifested by the nucleation of many sharp microcracks at the external boundary that rapidly propagate along the original contact interface. At the other extreme, when the material is a liquid, "failure" occurs through the nucleation and inward growth of large rounded ripples, characteristic of a Saffman-Taylor fingering instability. In the transition from glassy to viscous failure, sharp crack tips and smooth rounded fingers coexist during the crack propagation. In addition, whereas the detachment geometry of two glassy surfaces was characterized by a peeling-like mechanism along a plane, the fingers associated with the "snapping" of a liquid neck extended in all directions. These findings provide insights into the adhesion and failure mechanisms of materials at the micro/nanoscales and are also relevant to the action of interparticle forces between sugar particles, such as those used in inhalation drug delivery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".