MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095063168 · doi:10.1144/0016-764904-080

Small cordaitalean trees in a marine-influenced coastal habitat in the Pennsylvanian Joggins Formation, Nova Scotia

2005· article· en· W2095063168 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Geological Society · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Diversity and Evolution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaPennsylvanianGeologyNova (rocket)PaleontologyOceanographyHabitatEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cordaitales, an extinct order of plants closely related to the conifers, occupied a wide range of environments during Pennsylvanian times including wetlands, drylands, and uplands. However, claims that some species of cordaitalean grew on marine-influenced coastal margins, and therefore represented the earliest known mangrove communities, have been met with scepticism. Based on new data from the Joggins Formation of Nova Scotia, the ‘cordaitalean mangrove hypothesis’ is reassessed. Small fossil trees in growth position are described from micro-tidal deposits, a sedimentary association inferred to have formed on the margins of a brackish epicontinental sea. The autochthonous trees, which are morphologically different from lycopsid and calamitean trees commonly observed with the Joggins Formation, are probably cordaitalean. This affinity is indicated, in part, by facies-associated parautochthonous remains, which comprise Cordaites leaves, Cordaicladus branches, Cardiocarpus seeds, Cordaianthus reproductive organs, and Dadoxylon wood, a distinctively cordaitalean assemblage. Scour-and-mound structures in beds surrounding the upright trunks show that cordaitalean trees were, at times, submerged in shallow, flowing water. However, Limnopus tetrapod trackways at other horizons demonstrate periodic emergence, indicating that water depths fluctuated in these coastal forests. Analysis of rooting patterns shows that trees persisted through flooding events, despite partial burial by sheets of very fine sandstone and siltstone, survival being facilitated through the development of an adventitious rooting system. However, two key adaptations to growth in marine-influenced soils commonly seen in modern mangrove trees (low shoot:root ratios and small leaves) are not present in the cordaitalean trees. Furthermore, although the trees probably grew in close proximity to the brackish seacoast, direct evidence for marine influence in the fossil forest interval itself is lacking. Consequently, although the cordaitaleans were probably adapted to periodically submerged conditions, and additionally may have tolerated occasional brackish incursions, it is inappropriate to describe them as mangroves in the strict sense.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it