MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095068263 · doi:10.1063/1.4793473

Probing defect emissions in bulk, micro- and nano-sized α-Al2O3 via X-ray excited optical luminescence

2013· article· en· W2095068263 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhiqiang Wang, Chunlei Li, Lijia Liu, Tsun‐Kong Sham

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicZnO doping and properties
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLuminescenceXANESMaterials sciencePhotoluminescenceNanowireExcited stateAmorphous solidTransmission electron microscopyAbsorption (acoustics)ImpurityNanotechnologyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OptoelectronicsChemistryCrystallographyAtomic physicsSpectroscopyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electronic structure and optical properties of bulk, micro-sized, and nano-sized α-Al2O3 (wafer, microparticles (MPs), nanowires (NWs), and nanotubes (NTs)) have been investigated using X-ray absorption near-edge structures (XANES) and X-ray excited optical luminescence (XEOL). XANES results show that the wafer, MPs, and NTs have characteristic features of α-Al2O3. The NWs have a core∕shell structure with a single crystalline α-Al2O3 core surrounded by an amorphous shell, which is consistent with transmission electron microscopy result. It is found that some Al(3+) in the shell and core∕shell interface of the NWs as well as the surface of the NTs were reduced to Al(2+) or Al(1+) during the growth process. XEOL results show that the wafer and MPs have a broad emission at 325 nm and a sharp emission at 694 nm, which are attributed to F(+) center and Cr(3+) impurities, respectively. The NWs exhibit an intense emission at 404 nm that comes from F center, while the NTs show relatively weak luminescence at 325, 433, and 694 nm, which are attributed to F(+) center, F center, and Cr(3+) impurities, respectively. The O K-edge XEOL confirms that the emissions of α-Al2O3 in the range of 250-550 nm are related to the oxygen site. Furthermore, on the basis of XEOL and photoluminescence yield, the strong luminescence of the NWs (404 nm) is related to the Al(2+) or Al(1+) in the shell and core∕shell interface, while the luminescence of the NTs at 325 and 433 nm are related to the bulk and the Al(2+) or Al(1+) on the surface, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicZnO doping and propertiesFrench-language works237,207