SQUARE STEPPING EXERCISE E EXERCÍCIOS BÁSICOS NA COGNIÇÃO DE IDOSOS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O objetivo do presente estudo foi comparar as funções cognitivas de idosos antes e após dois protocolos de intervenção: exercícios básicos combinados com o Square Stepping Exercise (COM) e apenas exercícios básicos (EB). Todos foram avaliados antes e depois dos 4 meses de intervenção por meio do Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) e do Teste Winsconsin de Classificação de Cartas (TWCC). Os resultados mostraram que ambos os grupos melhoraram o estado cognitivo global, mas que apenas o COM apresentou melhora específica em abstração e flexibilidade mental. Assim, o treinamento combinado de exercícios básicos e SSE parece ser mais efetivo para a cognição quando comparado com um treinamento exclusivamente com exercícios básicos.Palavras-Chave: Idosos. Cognição. Exercício físico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".