MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Management of kostmann syndrome in the g‐csf era

2000· review· en· W2095095686 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Haematology · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBlood disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Washington
KeywordsNeutropeniaMedicineAbsolute neutrophil countInternal medicineGranulocyte colony-stimulating factorTransplantationCongenital NeutropeniaHematopoietic stem cell transplantationGastroenterologyImmunologyChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kostmann (1956, 1975) described an inherited haematological disorder with severe neutropenia with an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 0·2 × 109/l and early onset of severe bacterial infections. Most children died because of these infections, despite antibiotic treatment. Different treatment strategies for congenital neutropenia (CN) included use of steroids and lithium ( Barrett et al, 1977 ; Hraker et al, 1977 ), but these treatments did not show any long-term effect on neutrophil counts. Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) was the only curative treatment option for patients with human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-compatible donors ( Rappeport et al, 1980 ). Some patients who survived infections and treatment, however, underwent malignant transformation into acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) ( Gilman et al, 1970; Rosen & Kang, 1979) . The availability of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHuG-CSF) in 1987 ( Nagata et al, 1986; Souza et al, 1986 ) dramatically changed both the prognosis of CN and the quality of life for patients with CN ( Bonilla et al, 1989 ; Welte et al, 1990 ). Since the establishment of the Severe Chronic Neutropenia International Registry (SCNIR) in 1994, data on 304 patients with CN have been collected to monitor the clinical course, treatment and disease outcomes in these patients. In clinical trials, > 90% of these patients responded to rHuG-CSF treatment with an increase in ANC > 1·0 × 109/l. Importantly, all responding patients required significantly fewer antibiotics and days of hospitalizations ( Dale et al, 1993 ; Bonilla et al, 1994 ; Welte & Dale, 1996; Freedman, 1997; Welte & Boxer, 1997). Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only currently available treatment for those patients refractory to rHuG-CSF treatment that continue to have severe and life-threatening bacterial infections. Data from the SCNIR also demonstrate that for all CN patients, ≈ 9% will develop leukaemia regardless of their treatment or response ( Bonilla et al, 1994; Freedman, 1997; Welte & Boxer, 1997). The molecular and genetic basis for this disease is still largely unknown. Kostmann (1956) originally described a Swedish kindred with severe congenital neutropenia inherited as an autosomal recessive trait without additional haematological changes or other congenital abnormalities. This diagnosis is now often used for similar cases without a defined pattern of inheritance. We therefore prefer the term congenital neutropenia (CN) for the description of this patient population. The estimated frequency of this disorder is ≈ 1–2 cases per million with equal distribution for gender. In patients with CN, severe bacterial infections frequently occur during the first year of life. Omphalitis beginning directly after birth may be the first symptom, but also otitis media, pneumonitis and infections of the upper respiratory tract, abscesses of skin or liver are common infections which often lead to diagnosis. Cultures are mainly positive for Staphylococci or Streptococci, but also other bacteria, for example Pseudomonas and Peptostreptococcus, and fungi have been detected. For diagnosis, repeated differential blood counts are required, indicating persistent ANC within a range of 0–0·2 × 109/l. Blood counts often also indicate mild anaemia and thrombocytosis. There may also be increases in blood monocytes and eosinophils. Immunoglobulin levels for IgG are elevated in the majority of patients independent of their infectious status (unpublished data). The specific immunological competence after vaccination is also normal. Blood chemistry is within the normal age-dependent range for electrolytes, kidney and liver function. The bone marrow usually shows a maturation arrest of neutrophil precursors at an early stage (promyelocyte–myelocyte level) with few cells of the neutrophilic series beyond the promyelocyte stage. The number of promyelocytes is slightly increased ( Welte & Boxer, 1997). Marrow eosinophilia is common. Cellularity is usually normal or slightly decreased. Megakaryocytes are normal in number and morphology. The in vitro growth of granulocyte colonies in granulocyte–macrophage colony-forming unit (GM-CFU) assays is often defective with a maturation arrest that mimics the disease. The underlying genetic defect of Kostmann syndrome has still not been identified. In another congenital disorder associated with severe neutropenia, the glycogen-storage disease type 1b, the gene responsible for the disease maps to human chromosome 11q23 ( Annabi et al, 1998 ). The original hypothesis for Kostmann syndrome included a genetic predisposition resulting in defective production of G-CSF or defective response of the neutrophilic precursors to G-CSF or other haematopoietic growth factors. Western blot analysis and in vitro bioassays have shown that serum from patients with Kostmann syndrome contain normal or increased levels of G-CSF ( Mempel et al, 1991 ) with normal biological activity of endogenous G-CSF. G-CSF receptors are expressed on myeloid cells from patients with Kostmann syndrome ( Kyas et al, 1992 ). The numbers of G-CSF receptors are slightly increased. The binding constant for G-CSF to its receptor is normal. In CN patients who have developed leukaemia, acquired G-CSF receptor mutations affecting the cytoplasmic domain were present in most patients tested so far ( Dong et al, 1995 ; Tidow et al, 1997 ; Bernard et al, 1998; Germeshausen et al, 1999 ), suggestive of an important role of these mutations in the leukaemogenesis. The G-CSF receptor mutations so far have never been detectable from birth, indicating that these mutations are not responsible for the neutropenia but have developed through the course of life in a small subgroup of patients and are most likely caused by genetic instability. Therefore, G-CSF receptor analysis cannot be used for diagnostic purposes for the underlying disease, but might be helpful in screening for the risk of leukaemia. Differential diagnosis of Kostmann syndrome includes a number of other congenital or inherited disorders as well as the acquired diseases listed in Table I. The most common of these rare diseases (cyclic neutropenia, Shwachman–Diamond syndrome, glycogen-storage disease type 1b and autoimmune neutropenia in infancy) are described in more detail (see also Fig 1). Diagnostic procedure in neutropenia. Cyclic neutropenia. If infections (typically aphthous stomatitis) occur frequently at ≈ 3-week intervals, cyclic neutropenia should be considered and serial differential blood counts should be performed (at least three times per week over 6 weeks) to search for the typical cyclical pattern of blood neutrophils. Almost all patients with clinically obvious cyclic neutropenia have periods of severe neutropenia (ANC < 0·2 × 109/l) every 3 weeks showing some symptoms with almost every cycle, but significant infections (for example otitis, pneumonia and bacteraemia) usually are infrequent. Cyclic neutropenia occurs because of fluctuating rates of cell production by the bone marrow ( Quesenberry, 1983; Dale & Hammond, 1988). In contrast to other causes of neutropenia, in this disease the marrow oscillates between normal appearance and that of severe ‘maturation arrest’ of neutrophilic series. Other blood cells, such as platelets or reticulocytes, typically also show oscillations with a cyclical pattern. Cyclic neutropenia can occur sporadically, but there are families in which cyclic neutropenia is inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern ( Morley et al, 1967). As in Kostmann syndrome, patients with cyclic neutropenia also benefit from rHuG-CSF treatment ( Hammond et al, 1989). Other forms of rare neutropenia (Shwachman–Diamond syndrome and glycogen-storage disease type 1b. Patients who present with fatty and voluminous stools need testing for pancreatic function to rule out Shwachman–Diamond syndrome (SDS), which is an autosomal recessive disorder with multisystemic abnormalities, including exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, neutropenia and short stature. At the time of diagnosis, the phenotype of SDS is extremely variable. The vast majority of patients are diagnosed in infancy, with symptoms of steatorrhoea and poor growth, with or without haematological abnormalities ( Smith et al, 1996), but other less common manifestations can also be evident at diagnosis. These include extreme short stature, skeletal abnormalities, and marked hepatomegaly ( Aggett et al, 1980 ; Ginzberg et al, 1999). Glycogen-storage disease type 1b is a rare metabolic disorder which affects the transport system of glucose-6-phosphatase metabolism. Patients present with hepatomegaly, failure to thrive, renal dysfunction and recurrent infections. Chronic neutropenia in these patients is accompanied by phagocytic cell dysfunction, including decreased superoxide anion (O2−) generation, calcium (Ca2+) mobilization and chemotactic activity. Patients responded to treatment with r-metHuG-CSF, not only with an increase in ANC but also with improvement of the phagocytic activity of their neutrophils ( Schroten et al, 1991 ; McCawley et al, 1994 ). Presence of neutrophil specific antibodies. In children aged 1–3 years with neutropenia not caused by Kostmann syndrome, presence of neutrophil-specific autoantibodies can result in increased peripheral destruction of neutrophils. Although these infants lack peripheral blood neutrophils, they usually do not suffer from severe bacterial infections. In the serum of these patients, granulocyte-specific antibodies are detectable by different immunological tests ( Bux et al, 1998). Since 1987, rHuG-CSF has been available for treatment of CN. Phase I–III studies demonstrated the efficiency of rHuG-CSF on increasing the number of neutrophils that is associated with reduction of infections ( Bonilla et al, 1989 ; Dale et al, 1993 ). In contrast, granulocyte–macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) treatment does not lead to an increase in blood neutrophils, but only blood eosinophils ( Welte et al, 1990 ). In 1994, the Severe Chronic Neutropenia International Registry (SCNIR) was established in order to collect data on clinical course and outcome of these rare disorders. As of 31 December 1998, 304 patients with CN have been registered with the SCNIR. Of these 304 patients, > 95% responded to rHuG-CSF treatment, with an increase in absolute neutrophil counts of ≥ 1·0 × 109/l. Most CN patients respond to doses between 3 and 10 µg/kg/d. Dosing of rHuG-CSF is described in Table II and Fig 2. After initiation of rHuG-CSF with 5 μg/kg/d, the dose should be escalated to 10 µg/kg/d and then by increments of 10 µg/kg at 14-d intervals if the ANC remains below 1·0 × 109/l. As soon as the ANC can be maintained at ≥ 1·0 × 109/l, the rHuG-CSF dose does not need to be increased further as the occurrence of bacterial infection can be reduced dramatically with an ANC at this level. rHuG-CSF dose can be reduced if the ANC increases to 5·0 × 109/l or above to maintain the patient at the lowest dose necessary for maintaining a sufficient neutrophil count to overcome infections. Non-responders to rHuG-CSF are defined as those patients failing to respond to rHuG-CSF levels exceeding 120 µg/kg/d. Partial responders can increase their ANC to 0·5–1·0 × 109/l, but still have bacterial infections. In these patients, the dose of rHuG-CSF could not be increased because of the large volume and frequency of injections required. In some of these patients, a combination of rHuG-CSF with stem cell factor (SCF) led to an further increase in ANC. Because of potential allergic side-effects from SCF, this treatment combination has been only used during severe infections in hospitalized patients who receive concomitant antihistamine medication ( Zeidler et al, 1998 ). For those patients who do not respond to rHuG-CSF treatment alone or in combination with SCF, HSCT is the only currently available treatment ( Zeidler et al, 2000 ). When successful, patients achieve normal haematopoiesis after transplantation and do not require cytokine treatment. It remains difficult to give a recommendation for transplantation for patients with CN who benefit from rHuG-CSF and who show no evidence of impending malignant transformation. The risks associated with transplant from an HLA-identical sibling may outweigh the risk of leukaemic transformation when rHuG-CSF is continued in responding patients. If the risks of HSCT could be decreased by using a low-intensity regimen and inducing tolerance by mixed chimerism, then HSCT from a matched sibling donor may be used in the future. Dosing of G-CSF in congenital neutropenia patients. Before the availability of cytokine therapy, it had been recognized that leukaemic transformation occurred in patients with congenital neutropenia ( Gilman et al, 1970 ; Rosen & Kang, 1979). However, in the precytokine era, 42% of published cases died in the first 2 years of life, usually from sepsis or pneumonia. Thus, the true risk of congenital neutropenia patients developing myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/AML was not defined. With rHuG-CSF therapy, most of these patients have survived well beyond 2 years of age. Therefore, it is unknown whether the increased survival allows for a higher risk of the recognized natural expression of leukaemogenesis in this population in the absence of rHuG-CSF therapy. From the initiation of clinical trials with rHuG-CSF in 1987 until December 1998, a total of 31 severe CN (SCN) patients who had developed MDS/AML were reported to the SCNIR, all of whom have a diagnosis of congenital neutropenia. The overall incidence or crude rate of MDS/AML conversion was 8·8% for CN patients (31 cases among 352 exposed cases), with an average follow-up of approximately 5–6 years. Two of the total 31 congenital patients were diagnosed as having Shwachman–Diamond syndrome. No cases of MDS/AML occurred in the subgroup of patients suffering from cyclic or idiopathic neutropenia. Conversion to MDS/AML in SCN patients was associated with one or more cellular genetic abnormalities, for example monosomy 7, ras mutation or G-CSF receptor mutation, which may be useful to identify subgroups of patients at high risk ( Dong et al, 1995 ; Tidow et al, 1997 ). Of 31 patients who transformed in the registry series, 18 developed partial or complete loss of chromosome 7 (7q– or monosomy 7) in marrow cells. Interestingly, marrow cells from 11 SCN patients who transformed to MDS/AML also showed point mutations in the gene for G-CSF receptor, resulting in a truncated C-terminal cytoplasmic region of the receptor that is crucial for maturation signalling ( Dong et al, 1995 ; Tidow et al, 1997 ; Germeshausen et al, 1999 ). As illustrated by the cases described herein, the development of MDS/AML is a multistep process characterized by a series of cellular genetic changes, indicating a genetic predisposition to malignant transformation. If and how rHuG-CSF might have an impact upon this predisposition remains unclear; there are no historical controls for comparison to resolve this. To address further the issue of risk benefit of rHuG-CSF in the SCN setting with regard to MDS/AML, all available data were critically reviewed ( Freedman, 1997). It was recommended by the SCNIR advisory board that annual marrow cytogenetic testing to identify monosomy 7 or other changes indicating transformation is highly recommended in patients with congenital neutropenia. This will allow early therapeutic intervention such as bone marrow transplantation. The initial observation of bone pain and pathological fractures in a number of our patients led us to investigate bone mineral density in a cohort of 30 patients ( Yakisan et al, 1997 ); of these 30 patients, 15 (50%) had evidence of osteopenia/osteoporosis and in 5 of the 15 patients osteoporosis became a clinical problem with either pathological fractures or moderate back pain. Within the SCNIR, bone density measurements have been reported on a total of 121 patients with CN measured by different techniques, including quantitative computerized tomography (Q-CT), dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), single photon absorptiometry (SPA) and lumbar radiograph. Within these 121 patients, 66 (54·4%) had varying degrees of abnormal results. These results have not been quantified to interpret severity of abnormality. Most patients did not show clinical symptoms of osteopenia/osteoporosis such as bone pain or fractures, which helps to explain the reason why diagnostic procedures for bone density evaluation have not been reported in ≈ 70% of registry patients. Therefore, the actual incidence continues to remain unknown. The pathophysiology of osteopenia/osteoporosis also remains unclear. Serum chemistry did not reveal a typical pattern in patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis. Patients also did not receive elevated amounts of rHuG-CSF doses compared with all registry patients. Vasculitis has been reported in 3·3% (9/270) of patients with CN. Symptoms of vasculitis generally developed simultaneously with an increase in ANC and abated when ANC decreased. The results of the survey indicated that patients with recurrent vasculitis, or with renal involvement, need to be evaluated for other diseases. Vasculitis may be associated with autoimmune disorders or an underlying malignancy. After a temporary disruption of rHuG-CSF administration, the vasculitis has abated in all patients. In patients with congenital neutropenia, the incidence of palpable splenomegaly (2 cm below the costal margin) before treatment with rHuG-CSF was 20·6%. During the first year of rHuG-CSF therapy, the incidence increased to 38·9% and remained approximately at this level of occurrence (33·8–47·6%) over 10 years of therapy. Allowing for rHuG-CSF dose, there seems to be a general increase in spleen size with time. In some individuals, splenomegaly is associated with infections or with transformation to MDS/AML. All patients should be seen by a physician at least twice per year. Blood counts (whole blood count, haemoglobin, platelets and differential blood counts) and physical examination should be obtained at least every 3 months, including assessment for weight and height and documentation of intercurrent infections. Bone marrow examination (morphology plus cytogenetics) is required once per year to search for acquired cytogenetic abnormalities, such as monosomy 7 or trisomy 21. Additionally, after informed consent, bone marrow samples will be collected from CN patients for a variety of research studies for molecular analysis of the pathophysiology of CN. Additionally, G-CSF receptor analysis is performed on heparinized blood or bone marrow samples by laboratories headed by the SCNIR. In light of the reported studies and longitudinal data from the SCNIR, we suggest that the use of rHuG-CSF remains as the first-line treatment for most CN patients. Human stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from an HLA-identical sibling is beneficial for CN patients refractory to rHuG-CSF. For those patients in whom a G-CSF receptor mutation is identified, HSCT from an HLA-identical sibling is an option. Patients who develop monosomy 7, other significant chromosomal abnormalities or MDS/leukaemia should proceed urgently to HSCT. Data on alternative sources of donor stem cells are insufficient to assess outcome in patients with CN. Other than those patients who fail to respond to rHuG-CSF, the cytokine should be used to maintain an ANC ranging from 1·0 to 5·0 × 109/l with amelioration of symptoms. All CN patients, regardless of their treatment or response, have a 9% risk of developing MDS or leukaemia. Careful monitoring for cytogenetic abnormalities and G-CSF receptor mutation is necessary to initiate HSCT as soon as any of these occur. Despite the significant risk of leukaemia, HSCT-related morbidity is also significant and therefore without signs of leukaemia or a preleukaemic state HSCT should be restricted to G-CSF non-responders. We thank all colleagues associated with the Data Collection Centers of the Severe Chronic Neutropenia International Registry at the University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA (Audrey Anna Bolyard and Tammy Cottle), and the Medizinische Hochschule, Hannover, Germany (Kristine Crusius and Beate Schwinzer), for their continued assistance. We are also grateful to the many physicians world-wide who faithfully and generously submitted data on their patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.657

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it