Facilitating clinician adherence to guidelines in the intensive care unit: A multicenter, qualitative study*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine perceived facilitators and barriers to guideline implementation and clinician adherence to guidelines in the intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN: Multicenter qualitative study in three university-affiliated ICUs in Canada. METHODS: We conducted individual semistructured interviews of 44 ICU clinicians (12 intensivists, two physician directors, 12 nurses, three nurse educators, three nurse managers, nine respiratory therapists, and three respiratory therapist educators). We elicited attitudes and perceptions regarding the facilitators and barriers to adherence to guidelines in the ICU. We transcribed all interviews and analyzed data in duplicate using grounded theory to identify themes and develop a model to describe clinicians' views. MAIN RESULTS: The presence of a culture within the ICU that enabled guideline implementation and clinician adherence to guidelines was considered essential. Central to this culture was an ICU team that believed guidelines would reduce practice variation, help implement research findings at the bedside, and result in a more rapid implementation of best practice. Effective leadership and positive interprofessional team dynamics were deemed requisites for this culture. Important strategies identified by the participants to overcome potential barriers to clinician adherence to guidelines were: the presence of effective leaders to promote adoption of the guideline and its adherence, education tailored to the learning preferences of different professional groups, and repeated educational interventions, reminders, and audit and feedback. Participants suggested that the use of strategies to select and prioritize guidelines, simple guideline formats, and electronic media to implement guidelines may further contribute to successful guideline programs. CONCLUSIONS: Complex ICU practices and unique interprofessional team dynamics influence clinician adherence to guidelines. Initiatives that employ an approach addressing these issues may optimize guideline uptake and adherence. The optimal approach and its effectiveness may be guideline-dependent and requires further study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".