MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095204226

Managing telecom services through product lifecycle management model: The case of a telecom service provider in India

2010· article· en· W2095204226 on OpenAlex
Hassan Qudrat‐Ullah

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Information Management and Service · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicProduct Development and Customization
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnhanced Telecom Operations MapTelecom infrastructure sharingTelecommunicationsService providerTelecommunications serviceBusinessService (business)Service product managementProcess managementService designComputer scienceMarketing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Telecom service business in India is growing rapidly because of several factors including large population, relatively low charges, and huge wireless network expansion by private operators. Telecom service providers face problems in the management of “too many exiting products” and “huge demand for the new products”, simultaneously. This paper contributes with a solution to this “information integration and management” issue by utilizing two important concepts of project management: (i) product portfolio management (PPM), and product lifecycle management (PLM). Based on the developed PPM model, a suggestive framework for PLM is presented to help the telecom service providers effectively manage their existing products and also come up with an innovative process for creating new products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.633
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.008
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it