Proposed water management and control device for water losses problem in Jordan
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jordan is considered to be one of the most water-scarce countries in the world, where the water shortage problem has become of a permanent nature. All efforts are focused on managing water usage, saving existing water, and creating new water resources. In this paper, a water management and control device (WMCD) is proposed to solve the problem of floating storage tanks in areas which are not suited for the indirect water supply systems. The WMCD aims to manage the existing water in the storage tanks and automatically control the storage tanks filling operation with minimum energy and no water losses. The water management and control device consists of valves, sensors, and controllers; it uses a programmable logic control (PLC) to control the overall filling operation and to monitor the water level in the storage tanks. It satisfies its purpose by giving consumers the chance to manage their available water resources as they observe the level of water in their storage tanks continuously, and it controls the filling operation by means of water and pressure sensors, thus saving water and energy. Key words: water management, water control, storage tanks, control devices, Jordan, water losses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it