MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095239542 · doi:10.1121/1.4831243

Variability in acoustic transmission loss over a rough water surface

2013· article· en· W2095239542 on OpenAlexaff
Cristina Tollefsen, Sean Pecknold

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmission lossTransmission (telecommunications)Environmental scienceDeckRange (aeronautics)TurbulenceAcousticsMeteorologyAtmosphere (unit)Standard deviationSea stateGeologyMaterials sciencePhysicsMathematicsTelecommunicationsRemote sensingStatisticsOceanographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Variability in the acoustic transmission loss of impulsive sounds propagating in the atmosphere over a rough water surface was measured over time scales of 1–2 h at a fixed range of 250 m. On two separate days (26 and 30 May 2012), a propane cannon source was deployed on the upper deck of a ship. Once per minute, the propane cannon fired volleys of four shots that were recorded on a receiver deployed on a small boat tethered upwind of the ship. Meteorological conditions and sea state were comparable on both days, resulting in similar observations for transmission loss: mean and standard deviation of 64 ± 5 dB (26 May) and 66 dB ± 4 dB (30 May). The variability in transmission loss was high, with minimum and maximum values of 48 and 75 dB (26 May) and 53 and 77 dB (30 May). The transmission loss measured throughout the experiment exceeded the 48 dB predicted by assuming spherical spreading, since the receiver was upwind of the source. Measured results are compared to transmission loss computed from a parabolic equation model using an ensemble of turbulence and rough sea surfaces estimated from the meteorological conditions on board the ship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207