La restauration du village de Périllos par l’association Terre de pierres
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’association locale de sauvegarde du patrimoine Terre de pierres se consacre depuis 2006 à la restauration du village abandonné de Périllos, dans les Pyrénées-Orientales françaises. Pour l’association, la reconstruction se conçoit en harmonie avec la communauté locale, l’environnement et les matériaux disponibles dans la région. Son objectif est de faire revivre le village autant que de transmettre un savoir-faire relié aux techniques de constructions rurales d’autrefois. La reconstruction du site s’effectue grâce à l’aide des bénévoles de l’union REMPART, un système qui permet d’une part à Terre de pierres de reconstruire le village sans avoir à sacrifier ses impératifs de qualité aux objectifs de rentabilité, et d’autre part d’offrir à ses participants une expérience de tourisme participatif qui vient épouser les objectifs de développement durable mis de l’avant par l’UNESCO et l’Organisation mondiale du tourisme. Cette initiative de toute petite envergure permet d’observer la viabilité d’une conciliation entre les intérêts touristiques, écologiques et patrimoniaux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".