MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095261765 · doi:10.1021/je800735h

Kieserite Solubility in the Aqueous FeCl<sub>3</sub> + MgCl<sub>2</sub> + HCl System between (338 and 378) K

2009· article· en· W2095261765 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew W. Jones, Vladimiros G. Papangelakis, Johann D. T. Steyl

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical & Engineering Data · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicChemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolubilityChemistryAqueous solutionAbsolute deviationElectrolyteRelative standard deviationSulfateChlorideLeaching (pedology)SolventNickelAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ThermodynamicsChromatographyPhysical chemistrySoil scienceGeologyMathematicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kieserite (MgSO 4 ·H 2 O) solubility was measured at temperatures between (338 and 378) K, FeCl 3 concentrations of 1.0 mol·kg −1, MgCl 2 concentrations between (1.1 and 3) mol·kg −1, and HCl concentrations between (0.5 and 2.3) mol·kg −1 . These conditions are of interest because of their relevance for processes designed to extract nickel from oxide ores by atmospheric leaching in mixed sulfate−chloride solutions. Experimental data were compared with model predictions generated by use of OLI Software’s mixed solvent electrolyte (MSE) model. Model predictions for MgSO 4 ·H 2 O solubility were found to match experimental results with an average absolute deviation of ± 0.09 mol·kg −1 and an average absolute relative deviation of 11.1 %. The ability of the model to accurately predict solubility trends in solutions not used in the development of model parameters validates the model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical & Engineering DataSame topicChemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous SolutionsFrench-language works237,207