Post-thrombotic syndrome after total hip arthroplasty is uncommon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT), usually asymptomatic, is common after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a potential late complication of DVT, but there is limited data on its occurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of subjects at one hospital who had participated in a trial of thromboprophylaxis for THA and who had postoperative venography. Data were collected at baseline and 2-4 years later to ascertain symptoms of PTS using a modification of a validated scoring system. Outcomes were collected without knowledge of baseline characteristics or venogram results. Potential predictors of PTS were explored using exact logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The cohort (n=188) had a mean age of 63 years, 51% were male, 35% had a BMI of>30, and 4% had a prior history of DVT. 25 patients (13%) had DVTs on venography. 12 patients (6%, 95% CI: 3-11) subsequently developed symptoms consistent with PTS, 7 with bilateral symptoms. Most affected limbs (15 of 19) had no postoperative DVT. No statistically significant predictors of PTS were found. INTERPRETATION: Symptoms of PTS are infrequent after THA in patients who receive some form of thromboprophylaxis. Our findings, which are consistent with the existing literature, suggest that there is a potential benefit to giving thromboprophylaxis for reduction of symptomatic PTS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".