Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of the Polyclonal Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Fragment Antibody AZD9773 in Adult Patients With Severe Sepsis and/or Septic Shock
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This trial compared the efficacy/safety of two IV doses of AZD9773, a polyclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor-α, in adult patients with severe sepsis/septic shock. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb trial. SETTING: ICUs in seven countries (Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Finland, France, and Spain). PATIENTS: Patients 18 years old or older with severe sepsis and/or septic shock. Patients were required to have 1) objective clinical evidence of infection; 2) at least two of four systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria; and 3) cardiovascular and/or respiratory sepsis-related failure. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to a single loading infusion of AZD9773 250 U/kg followed by 50 U/kg every 12 hours (low dose, n = 100), a single loading infusion of AZD9773 500 U/kg followed by 100 U/kg every 12 hours (high dose, n = 100), or placebo (n = 100) for 5 days. Follow-up assessments were performed up to day 90. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean number of ventilator-free days (primary endpoint) did not differ between low-dose (19.7 d) or high-dose AZD9773 (17.3 d) and placebo (18.3 d) (one-sided p = 0.18 and 0.74, respectively). Mortality rates were comparable across treatment groups; relative risk of death versus placebo at day 29 was 0.80 for low-dose AZD9773 (one-sided p = 0.25) and 1.64 for high-dose AZD9773 (p = 0.97). Most patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (87.8% in AZD9773-treated patients, 92.9% in placebo patients) although most were mild/moderate in nature. No differences in the incidence of adverse events or laboratory or vital sign abnormalities were observed between groups. CONCLUSIONS: AZD9773 rapidly and efficiently decreased plasma tumor necrosis factor-α concentration in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock, but this effect did not translate into clinical benefit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".