MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095273987 · doi:10.1021/pr0700798

Identification of Candidate Biomarker Proteins Released by Human Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Cells Using Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry

2007· article· en· W2095273987 on OpenAlexaff
Hongyan Li, Leroi V. DeSouza, Shaun Ghanny, Wei Li, Alexander D. Romaschin, Terence J. Colgan, K. W. Michael Siu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Proteome Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's HospitalMount Sinai Hospital
FundersScheme for Promotion of Academic and Research Collaboration
KeywordsHeLaProteomeChemistryBiomarkerMass spectrometryTandem mass spectrometryProteomicsChromatographyBiomarker discoveryCervical cancerEndometrial cancerLiquid chromatography–mass spectrometryCancerMolecular biologyBiochemistryBiologyCellGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Candidate biomarker proteins, including chaperonin 10 and pyruvate kinase, previously discovered and identified using mass-tagging reagents with multidimensional liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (DeSouza, L.; et al. J. Proteome Res. 2005, 4, 377−386) have been identified in serum-free media of cultured endometrial cancer (KLE and HEC-1-A) and cervical cancer (HeLa) cells. These and other cancer-associated proteins were released by the cultured cells within 24 h of growth. A total of 203 proteins from the KLE cells, 86 from HEC-1-A, and 161 from HeLa are reported. Keywords: Endometrial cancer • Cell released proteins • Candidate biomarkers • Two-dimensional liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.479

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Proteome ResearchSame topicRNA Research and SplicingFrench-language works237,207