MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095331392 · doi:10.1163/156939309788019921

Analysis of Multiport Receivers Using FDTD Technique

2009· article· en· W2095331392 on OpenAlexaff
N. V. Sani, Abbas Mohammadi, Abdolali Abdipour, Fadhel M. Ghannouchi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite-difference time-domain methodDetectorMicrostripNonlinear systemDiodeElectronic circuitPIN diodeComputer scienceElectronic engineeringOpticsTelecommunicationsPhysicsElectrical engineeringOptoelectronicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the full wave analysis of multiport direct conversion receivers using finite-difference time-domain technique is presented. An explicit and efficient formula for FDTD analysis of nonlinear detector diodes is extracted. Using this formula, the multiport receivers including both passive microstrip part and nonlinear detectors are analyzed using FDTD method. The receivers are also implemented using microstrip circuits and detector diodes for S band and Ka-band radio systems. Then, the results obtained using FDTD are verified with measurements. An excellent agreement between the results confirms the accuracy and efficiency of the full wave analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Electromagnetic Waves and ApplicationsSame topicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical MethodsFrench-language works237,207