MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095344774 · doi:10.1080/10406630290103889

Particle Formation and Gas/Particle Partition Measurements of the Products of the Naphthalene-OH Radical Reaction in a Smog Chamber

2002· article· en· W2095344774 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolycyclic aromatic compounds · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryNaphthaleneAerosolParticle (ecology)NucleationPhotodissociationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)RadicalGas phasePhotochemistryPhysical chemistryChromatographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The formation of particles during the reaction of naphthalene with OH radicals in a smog chamber was followed by means of a scanning particle-sizing system and aerosol spectrometer probe. The initial formation of nucleation-sized particles (0.03-0.09 w m) quickly grew into an accumulation mode (0.1-3.0 w m) during the photolysis. A small nucleation mode component, however, persisted throughout the experiment, although the major portion of the mass is found in the accumulation mode at later stages in the reaction. Multichannel, annular, diffusion denuders have been used to determine the gas/particle partition factors for many of the observed products. While 1,4-naphthoquinone appears predominantly in the gas phase, the 1- and 2-naphthols and the nitronaphthalenes were found predominantly in the particle phase. Although 2-formylcinnamaldehyde, the most abundant product in the naphthalene-OH photolysis, was split approximately evenly between the gaseous and the particulate phases, the 2-formylcinnamic acid was found almost exclusively in the particle phase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it