MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095347465 · doi:10.1117/12.628797

Micro-opto mechanical biosensors for enzymatic detection

2005· article· en· W2095347465 on OpenAlexaff
Amritsar Jeetender, Ion Stiharu, Muthukumaran Packirisamy

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMechanical and Optical Resonators
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCantileverBiosensorMaterials scienceNanotechnologyAnalyteMicroelectromechanical systemsOptoelectronicsChemistryComposite materialChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Miniaturization and highly accurate detection technologies are key factors to advancing sensor performance and utility and the search for such technologies promises accomplishments with the advent of Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) structures. MEMS is an enabling technology that can create integrated devices with mechanical, optical and electronic components. One of the fields where these micro-devices are successfully widespread is that of medical care where micro-machined cantilever sensors are found to be the ideal candidates for bio-sensing applications. These micro-machined cantilevers have been proposed as mechanical transducers for different sensing applications. These sensing surfaces are of interest in the development of novel cantilever-based biosensors. The fascinating aspect about these transducers is that they bend due to modifications in nano-mechanical interactions between neighboring molecules which curve the beam and that curvature can be optically detected. In this paper, PVDF-cantilevers are coated with 2 sets of antibody and antigen on one side, which respond with specific deflection signatures to each other and their intermolecular nano-mechanics bend the cantilever. The first set of antibody and antigen used here are rabbit skeletal muscle Troponin C (TnC) and Honey Bee Venom Melittin (ME) prepared in 50mM KCl and 50mM Tris-HCl buffer at a pH of 7.5 in a 1:1 ratio. The next set used were Horse Raddish Peroxide (HRP) and Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) prepared to get 10mg per 1ml of 0.1M Potassium Phosphate dibasic (K2HPO4) and diluted hydrochloric acid to get pH of 6.0. The optical system includes a laser source and a Position Sensitive Detector (PSD) which is used to readout deflections of the PVDF-cantilevers. The behavior of the cantilevers was also monitored with the enzymes under the influence of voltage. The classical problem of evaluating the tip deflection of the cantilever beam is analyzed involving the relation between movement recorded by the PSD, the tip deflection and angle of incidence. The combined results provide valuable information on the development of an optimizing sensing element that would enable life saving treatments of patients suffering from Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicMechanical and Optical ResonatorsFrench-language works237,207