FROM STRUCTURE TOPOLOGY TO CHEMICAL COMPOSITION. IV. TITANIUM SILICATES: THE ORTHORHOMBIC POLYTYPE OF NABALAMPROPHYLLITE FROM THE LOVOZERO MASSIF, KOLA PENINSULA, RUSSIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The crystal structure of nabalamprophyllite-2 O , an orthorhombic polytype of nabalamprophyllite, ideally (BaNa) Na 3 Ti 3 (Si 2 O 7 ) 2 O 2 (OH) 2 , a 19.564(2), b 7.1173(5), c 5.4144(4) A, V 753.90(4) A 3 , space group Pnmn , Z = 2, D calc. 3.410 g.cm −3 , from the Yubileinaya vein, Karnasurt Mountain, Lovozero alkaline massif, Kola Peninsula, Russia, has been refined to a R 1 of 5.1% on the basis of 669 unique reflections ( F o > 4σ F ), collected on a Bruker P 4 diffractometer with a CCD 4K Smart detector and Mo K α radiation. An electron-microprobe analysis gave (wt.%): SiO 2 29.79, Al 2 O 3 0.16, Nb 2 O 5 0.71, TiO 2 27.85, Fe 2 O 3 1.05, MnO 3.52, MgO 0.20, CaO 0.15, SrO 6.09, BaO 16.55, K 2 O 1.14, Na 2 O 10.89, F 1.53, H 2 O 0.99 (calculated from structure refinement), O=F −0.64, total 99.98. The empirical formula is (Ba 0.87 Sr 0.47 Na 0.28 K 0.20 Ca 0.02 □ 0.16 ) ∑2 (Na 2.56 Mn 0.40 2+ Mg 0.04 ) ∑3 (Ti 2.81 Fe 0.11 3+ Nb 0.04 Al 0.03 ) ∑3 (Si 2 O 7 ) 2 [(OH) 0.89 F 0.65 O 0.46 ] ∑2 , Z = 2, calculated on the basis of 4 Si apfu . The crystal structure of nabalamprophyllite-2 O can be described as a combination of a TS block and an I block. The TS (titanium silicate) block consists of HOH sheets (H: heteropolyhedral, O: octahedral), and occurs in 24 Ti disilicate minerals. In the TS block, there are five cation sites, a [4]-coordinated Si site with = 1.631 A, two Ti-dominant sites, the [5]-coordinated M H site and [6]-coordinated M O (1) site, and two [6]-coordinated Na-dominant sites, M O (2) and M O (3). The M H site (Ti 1.97 Al 0.03 apfu ) is coordinated by five O atoms, with H –O> = 1.91 A ; the M O (1) site (Ti 0.85 Fe 0.11 3+ Nb 0.04 apfu ) is coordinated by four O atoms and two OH groups, with O (1)–O,OH> = 2.00 A ; the M O (2) and M O (3) sites (Na 1.00 and Na 1.56 Mn 0.40 2+ Ca 0.08 Mg 0.04 apfu , respectively) are coordinated by six O atoms with O (2)–O> = 2.44 A and four O atoms and two OH groups, with O (3)–O,OH> = 2.30 A, respectively. The M H square pyramids and (Si 2 O 7 ) groups constitute the H sheet. The M O (1–3) octahedra form the close-packed O sheet. Linkage of H and O sheets occurs via common vertices of M H square pyramids and (Si 2 O 7 ) groups with M O (1–3) octahedra. The I block includes the [10]-coordinated A P sites (Ba 0.87 Sr 0.47 Na 0.28 K 0.20 Ca 0.02 □ 0.16 apfu ) with A P –O> = 2.82 A. The TS block and the I block [which ideally is a layer of (BaNa) atoms] alternate along a . The ideal formula of nabalamprophyllite-2 O is (BaNa) Na 3 Ti 3 (Si 2 O 7 ) 2 O 2 (OH) 2 , in accord with the general formula of nabalamprophyllite-2 M , Ba Na Na 3 Ti 3 (Si 2 O 7 ) 2 O 2 (OH) 2 , space group P 2/ m , previously known as nabalamprophyllite. The structure topology of nabalamprophyllite-2 O differs from that of nabalamprophyllite-2 M in (1) disorder/order of the A P cations in the I block, and (2) different stacking order of TS blocks. In nabalamprophyllite-2 O , Ba and Na atoms are disordered at one A P site; in nabalamprophyllite-2 M , Ba and Na atoms are dominant each at one of two A P sites. The difference in stacking order of TS blocks in nabalamprophyllite polytypes is identical to that in lamprophyllite-2 O and lamprophyllite-2 M . In Ti disilicates with the TS block, hainite, (Ca 3 REE) Na (NaCa)Ti (Si 2 O 7 ) 2 OF 3 , and rinkite, (Ca 3 REE) Na (NaCa)Ti (Si 2 O 7 ) 2 OF 3 , can be considered as polytypes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".