Ètude des interfaces SiO<sub>2</sub>/TiO<sub>2</sub> et TiO<sub>2</sub>/SiO<sub>2</sub> dans la structure SiO<sub>2</sub>/TiO<sub>2</sub>/SiO<sub>2</sub>/c-Si préparée par pulvérisation cathodique radio fréquence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The atomic structure of the TiO2/SiO2 and SiO2/TiO2 interfaces has been investigated in SiO2/TiO2/SiO2 multilayers deposited by radio frequency reactive sputtering without breaking the vacuum on the crystalline substrate cooled by water. The characterizations of these interfaces have been performed using three complementary techniques sensitive to surface and interface state: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXD), and specular X-ray reflectometry (GIXR). The concentration profiles and Si2p and O1s core level chemical displacements show that TiO2/SiO2 and SiO2/TiO2 interfaces are very diffuse. The reflectometry measurements confirm this character and indicate that the silicon, titanium, and oxygen atomic concentrations vary gradually at the interfaces. The grazing incidence X-ray spectra indicates that the interfacial layers are not well crystallized and are formed by SiO2-TiO2, TiO, Ti2O3, Ti3O5, Ti5Si3, Ti5Si4, TiSi, and TiSi2 components.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".