MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095394262 · doi:10.1109/cscwd.2007.4281478

AGeMoS: An Agent-Based Generic Monitoring Approach for Self-Management Systems

2007· article· en· W2095394262 on OpenAlex
Zhaohua Rao, Hamada Ghenniwa, Abdallah Shami

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDistributed computingResource management (computing)Multi-agent systemNetwork monitoringResource (disambiguation)Systems engineeringSoftware engineeringArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self-management is an emerging computing paradigm to deal with the arising complexity in today's cooperative design environment. An essential element of self-management is a monitoring system. This paper proposed an agent-based generic monitoring system (AGeMoS) to integrate multiple probe solutions in order to support the monitoring of various systems in multiple aspects, including functionality, performance and resource utilization. An approach for specifying the monitoring tasks of architectural properties is also proposed. With the autonomy endowed by agent-oriented approach, AGeMoS is capable of automatically configuring the integrated probe solutions and processing the monitoring results according to the architectural properties' specifications at runtime. The proposed approach has been validated through a prototype implementation and experimentation to measure network performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it