MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095407442 · doi:10.3992/jgb.7.1.3

INTEGRATING OPERATIONS AND RESEARCH TO DEMONSTRATE BIOENERGY HEATING AT THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA

2012· article· en· W2095407442 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Green Building · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioenergyRenewable energyHeating systemEnvironmental economicsBiomass (ecology)Resource (disambiguation)Sustainable energyEngineeringEnvironmental resource managementArchitectural engineeringEnvironmental scienceBusinessComputer scienceEcologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION The University of Northern British Columbia (UNBC) has implemented two bioenergy heating projects to demonstrate renewable energy and carry out research on sustainable resource usage. These projects are of particular interest to remote communities and further the institution's aim to be Canada's Green University™. The wood pellet system is a template for a community building heating system, while the gasification system is sufficient to supply a community scale district energy system. Both projects demonstrate that bioenergy can be implemented at an institutional level, low levels of particulate emissions are achievable, and that integrating campus operations with research provides relevant demonstration of leading-edge technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.241
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it