Entre textes urbains et critique cinématographique : Kracauer scénariste de la ville
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les rapports entre la ville et le cinéma chez Siegfried Kracauer ont été abordés surtout à partir de ses textes sur la ville et de ses essais sur les médias photographiques des années 1920 et 1930. Le présent article se propose d’éclairer plus avant les liens entre textes urbains, critiques de film et élaboration théorique, en se penchant sur de courts textes, négligés par la recherche, dans lesquels Kracauer esquisse des projets de scénarios. La contextualisation de ces textes destinés à la production cinématographique et leur mise en perspective historique mettent à jour les déplacements et les transformations, dans un mouvement à la fois de continuité et de discontinuité, des concepts kracaueriens établis dès les années 1920. Parallèlement à la mise en place de la notion centrale de perception estrangée, on voit se dessiner la centralité du médium film pour la pensée de Kracauer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".