MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095489911 · doi:10.2310/7750.2008.06004

Case Report of Primary Rectal Melanoma and Review of the Etiology of Melanoma

2008· review· en· W2095489911 on OpenAlexaff
Lauren Fratesi, Raed Alhusayen, James D. Walker

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMelanomaEtiologyRectumMucosal melanomaDermatologyMalignancyColonoscopyPathologyColorectal cancerSurgeryInternal medicineCancerCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Primary rectal melanoma is a very rare and aggressive malignancy. It is defined as melanoma arising in the rectal mucosa, more than 4 cm from the anal verge. OBJECTIVE: A case of primary rectal melanoma is reported, and the theories of the etiology of melanoma are reviewed. METHODS AND RESULTS: This article reports a case of a 75-year-old woman who presented with lower gastrointestinal bleeding and abdominal discomfort. A polyp was removed from the low-lying rectum during colonoscopy. After immunohistochemical staining and microscopic examination, it was diagnosed as melanoma. CONCLUSION: In light of primary melanoma in sun-shielded regions such as the rectum, theories of causation other than sun exposure merit consideration. Factors such as genetics, immunosuppression, and virus infections, as well as ultraviolet radiation, may play a role in the etiology of melanoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and SurgerySame topicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementFrench-language works237,207