MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095504760 · doi:10.1299/jsmec.46.349

A Lorentz Force Type Self-Bearing Motor with New 4-Pole Winding Configuration

2003· article· en· W2095504760 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJSME International Journal Series C · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMagnetic Bearings and Levitation Dynamics
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & TechnologyMD Precision (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLorentz forceBearing (navigation)Rotor (electric)Control theory (sociology)MagnetMagnetic bearingType (biology)Computer sciencePhysicsMechanical engineeringEngineeringMagnetic fieldControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aiming at small high-speed rotating machines, this paper proposes a Lorentz force type self-bearing motor, where a new four-pole winding configuration is used to make it function both as a synchronous permanent-magnet motor and as a magnetic bearing. Due to using Lorentz force dominantly, the proposed motor has some good points such as linearity of control force and facility of design and analysis. And compared with the 8-pole type previously developed, it is advantageous at high speed. Focusing on the feasibility of the proposed motor, this paper introduces a prototype, which is manufactured in disk type with an outer rotor and successfully run up to 12600rpm without contact. Static and dynamic characteristics of the prototype are examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score0.676

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it