MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095509789 · doi:10.1142/s0218001404003794

A HYBRID STEREO FEATURE MATCHING ALGORITHM FOR STEREO VISION-BASED BIN PICKING

2004· article· en· W2095509789 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WindsorBC Innovation Council
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpipolar geometryAffine transformationArtificial intelligenceFeature (linguistics)Computer visionMatching (statistics)Similarity (geometry)Constraint (computer-aided design)Computer stereo visionStereopsisPattern recognition (psychology)Computer sciencePerspective (graphical)Transformation (genetics)BinMathematicsAlgorithmImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stereo vision-based bin picking systems require accurate 3D information to be recovered from 2D stereo images. To achieve this goal, we have developed a hybrid coarse-to-fine algorithm for stereo feature matching, which is based on the 2D six-parameter affine transformation and local similarity evaluation. With this algorithm, the coarse matching is performed by the 2D six-parameter affine transformation to get rough feature matches, imposing a strong constraint to further search instead of the traditional epipolar constraint. To obtain precise matches, the perspective effect is dealt with fine stereo feature matching by performing local similarity evaluation on the attribute vectors of features. Experimental results proving the performance of the stereo feature matching algorithm are also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it