Delayed threshold for active cutaneous vasodilation in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Epidemiological evidence suggests decreased heat tolerance in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but it is not known whether the mechanisms involved in thermoregulatory control of skin blood flow are altered in these patients. We tested the hypothesis that individuals with T2DM have a delayed internal temperature threshold for active cutaneous vasodilation during whole body heating compared with healthy control subjects. We measured skin blood flow using laser-Doppler flowmetry (LDF), internal temperature (T or) via sublingual thermocouple, and mean arterial pressure via Finometer at baseline and during whole body heating in 9 T2DM patients and 10 control subjects of similar age, height, and weight. At one LDF site, sympathetic noradrenergic neurotransmission was blocked by local pretreatment with bretylium tosylate (BT) to isolate the cutaneous active vasodilator system. Whole body heating was conducted using a water-perfused suit. There were no differences in preheating T(or) between groups (P > 0.10). Patients with T2DM exhibited an increased internal temperature threshold for the onset of vasodilation at both untreated and BT-treated sites. At BT-treated sites, T or thresholds were 36.28 +/- 0.07 degrees C in controls and 36.55 +/- 0.05 degrees C in T2DM patients (P < 0.05), indicating delayed onset of active vasodilation in patients. Sensitivity of vasodilation was variable in both groups, with no consistent difference between groups (P > 0.05). We conclude that altered control of active cutaneous vasodilation may contribute to impaired thermoregulation in patients with T2DM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".