MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095540595 · doi:10.1115/imece2010-39307

Soft Tissue Characterization Using One Dimensional Lumped Mass-Spring-Damper Model

2010· article· en· W2095540595 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Zahiri-Azar, Ali Baghani, Septimiu E. Salcudean, Robert Rohling

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElasticity and Material Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElasticity (physics)Characterization (materials science)Soft tissueDamperMaterials scienceDeformation (meteorology)Spring (device)Computer scienceBiomedical engineeringMechanical engineeringStructural engineeringComposite materialEngineeringNanotechnologyPathologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The characterization of tissue mechanical properties, such as its elasticity and viscosity, has proven to be useful in numerous clinical applications. For this reason, several techniques have been suggested in the literature to provide non-invasive estimates of these properties. Common to all these technique, an external or internal source is used to deform the tissue. The response of the tissue to this deformation is then measured and used to estimate its mechanical properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.528
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElasticity and Material ModelingFrench-language works237,207