MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095549754 · doi:10.1517/13543780903179294

Emerging oligonucleotide therapies for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

2009· review· en· W2095549754 on OpenAlexaff
Rosanne Séguin

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Investigational Drugs · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsBusiness Development Bank of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsthmaCOPDDiseaseInflammationIntensive care medicineImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic respiratory diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are disorders of the airways largely related to the presence of persistent inflammation. The approval of inhaled corticosteroids in the early 1970s pioneered a new age of therapy in treating chronic inflammatory airway diseases. This was the first time that an anti-inflammatory product was available to reduce the characteristic lung inflammation in airways and the associated obstruction, inflammation and hyper-responsiveness. Fast forward 40 years: corticosteroids are still an important therapeutic intervention; however, they exhibit limited use in moderate to severe asthma and COPD. Oligonucleotide therapies are an emerging class which include the antisense, the RNAi (siRNA and miRNA), the immunomodulatory, the aptamer and the decoy approaches. As these approaches are rather recent in the respiratory field, most are still early in development. Nevertheless, with limitations of current small molecule therapies and the hurdles faced with biologics, the use of oligonucleotides is relevant and the door is open to the development of this category of therapeutics. This review focuses on the major classes of oligonucleotides that are currently in late stage preclinical or clinical development for the treatment of asthma and COPD, and discusses the implications for their use as therapies for respiratory diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Investigational DrugsSame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207