Harmonization between architecture and nature through traditional japanese screens
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Harmonization between architecture and nature is one principle deeply rooted in traditional Japanese architecture, infl uencing all aspects of space creation. Buildings are not seen as individual objects, but as part of the existing environment, resulting in the development of design principles which enhance these qualities. Although there are many components in traditional architecture which promote these principles, one of the most important ones is boundaries. Through the precise control of boundaries, a space can be given a new meaning and even perceived in a new manner. Traditional screen systems known in Japanese as 'shoji' give spaces the fl exibility needed to adapt to a changing environment, given the inhabitants control of views, illumination and ventilation. This adaptability of traditional spaces has been studied through a case study of a single tea room, which was then simulated through 3D modelling software, permitting the analysis of the space during different times and seasons. The results highlight the important design principles used to improve the interaction of spaces, while showing possible applications in urban spaces in the creation of adaptable screen systems suited towards a constantly changing environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it