Paleomagnetism of the mid-Cretaceous gem-bearing pegmatite dikes of San Diego County, California, USA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pegmatite dikes in the Peninsular Ranges batholith of southwestern California have produced spectacular crystals of semiprecious and precious minerals for over a century. Aside from their economic importance, these dikes straddle a major tectonic boundary and were used to test hypotheses related to the timing and development of this composite batholith. Paleomagnetic analysis of 252 specimens from 20 sites (12 and 8 sites in the western and eastern zones of the batholith, respectively, from 11 mines in five dike districts) isolated a stable characteristic remanent magnetization direction at 19 sites. The site mean directions for the western and eastern zones are statistically indistinguishable at 95% confidence, supporting petrologic and geochemical arguments that the dikes of the two zones are coeval and cogenetic. After correction for the Neogene opening of the Gulf of California, the paleopole for all 19 site mean directions is indistinguishable from the 94 Ma reference paleopole for North America and supports hypotheses that (1) the dikes are genetically related to intrusion of the La Posta-type plutons; (2) the batholith was already assembled beside the northwestern coastline of Mexico at 94 Ma; (3) ENE-side-up tilting of fault blocks in the batholith’s western zone ended by ∼94 Ma; and (4) the far-sided and clockwise-rotated discordant paleopoles found commonly in Late Cretaceous and younger sedimentary rocks of the batholith’s region are mostly the result of inclination-flattening of the remanence and (or) remagnetization by fluid flow, creating a secondary remanence, excluding Neogene tectonic rotations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".