Citoyenneté, espace public etmulticulturalisme : la politique canadienne de multiculturalisme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte analyse les transformations depuis 1971 de la politique canadienne de multiculturalisme et du discours gouvernementalles justifiant. On tente de saisir dans quelle mesure ces transformations répondent à la double exigence de la reconnaissancedes individus membres de communautés ethnoculturelles minoritaires et du maintien de la cohésion sociale. La justice dansune société multiculturelle nécessite des modifications à la culture publique commune, mais celles-ci ne peuvent toutefois allerjusqu’à miner l’existence des valeurs communes et sans questionner l’égale citoyenneté. Or, cette citoyenneté ne peut êtreconçue uniquement en termes abstraits et universels : il faut que les citoyens partagent une culture publique commune, ce quisignifie que des limites doivent être posées à la tolérance et à la diversité culturelle. Sinon, comme le démontre le cas canadien,le multiculturalisme risque de rendre encore plus problématique l’unité nationale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.030 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".