MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095595190 · doi:10.1109/smi.2007.4

Adapting Geometric Attributes for Expression-Invariant 3D Face Recognition

2007· article· en· W2095595190 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace recognition and analysis
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEigenfaceGeodesicFacial recognition systemArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Invariant (physics)Classifier (UML)Facial expressionFace (sociological concept)Three-dimensional face recognitionExpression (computer science)Computer visionMathematicsFace detectionGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the use of multiple intrinsic geometric attributes, including angles, geodesic distances, and curvatures, for 3D face recognition, where each face is represented by a triangle mesh, preprocessed to possess a uniform connectivity. As invariance to facial expressions holds the key to improving recognition performance, we propose to train for the component-wise weights to be applied to each individual attribute, as well as the weights used to combine the attributes, in order to adapt to expression variations. Using the eigenface approach based on the training results and a nearest neighbor classifier, we report recognition results on the expression-rich GavabDB face database and the well-known Notre Dame FRGC 3D database. We also perform a cross validation between the two databases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFace recognition and analysisFrench-language works237,207