MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095617538 · doi:10.1109/rtc.2009.5321977

A Sub-Nanosecond Edge Detection System using embedded FPGA fabrics

2009· article· en· W2095617538 on OpenAlexaff
Louis Arpin, Mélanie Bergeron, Marc‐André Tétrault, Roger Lecomte, Réjean Fontaine

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayComputer scienceSignal edgeOversamplingTime-to-digital converterElectronic engineeringComputer hardwareEngineeringDigital signal processingJitterAnalog signalClock signalBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The time to digital converter (TDC) concept is quite useful to obtain crucial timing information for nuclear radiation detection such as PET imaging applications. The high resolution nature of TDC makes them sensitive to processing and to temperature variations. Thus, a calibration procedure must often be performed to improve measurements. Moreover, field programmable gate array (FPGA)-based TDC exacerbates this problem because the transistor topology is fixed in the fabric for low cost purpose. A sub-nanosecond edge detection system able to overcome process, power supply voltage and temperature (PVT) variations was designed and implemented in an FPGA. Unlike other FPGA-based TDCs, this new solution uses embedded PVT invariant digital delay lines and deserializers included in I/O ports along with a stable clock oscillator resulting in low logic usage. The proposed approach consists in oversampling digital signals to enable absolute timestamps down to 75 ps resolution (31.85 ps rms). As a proof of concept, this paper reports timing resolution down to 321.5 ps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207