MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095647628 · doi:10.1061/9780784413692.020

Concrete Bar-Wrapped Cylinder Pipe (C303) Condition Assessment Increases the Reliability of the City of Calgary's Water Infrastructure

2014· article· en· W2095647628 on OpenAlexaffabout
Joanna Fugler, Andy Hughes, T F Ross

Bibliographic record

VenuePipelines 2014 · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsPure NorthCalgary Laboratory Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline (software)Economic shortageEngineeringForensic engineeringCivil engineeringMechanical engineeringGovernment (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In July of 2011, the Rundle Feedermain, a 24-in. (600-mm) C303 concrete bar-wrapped pipe (BWP) transmission main, failed in a residential neighborhood in the City of Calgary (the City). Residential development had cropped up around the feedermain since its construction in 1973. Although the main is located in an easement, the exact break location was 9 ft (3 m) west of a residential property line. This increased the main's consequence of failure, as additional ruptures may cause serious damage to private property. To return the Rundle Feedermain to operation, the City commissioned Pure Technologies (Pure) to complete an emergency inspection of the pipeline. Pure mobilized available inspection platforms to examine the line upstream and downstream of the failure location to ensure that no other pipe sections were at risk of rupture. The inspection used a robotics platform equipped with Pure's electromagnetic (EM) technology, which is able to identify broken bars and broad areas of cylinder corrosion in BWP. The emergency assessment identified four additional areas of distress and allowed the City to repair a second section of BWP that was likely to fail had the pipeline returned to operation. After the successful inspection of the Rundle Feedermain, the City of Calgary began incorporating BWP inspection into its biannual feedermain condition assessment program. Due to this shift in focus, in August of 2013 the City excavated one section of 30-in. (750-mm) BWP that was identified as badly distressed during the inspection program. The excavation verified that the pipe had broken bars and cylinder corrosion and was a candidate for near-term failure if left in operation. Due to the various operating conditions encountered in the program and with the City's cooperation, Pure has been able to refine and improve BWP inspection technology and apply it to multiple inspection vehicle platforms to assess the City's BWP mains. Through condition assessment, the City is able to identify and repair isolated damaged pipe sections on otherwise serviceable pipelines. This prevents unnecessary and expensive main rehabilitation or replacement, while renewing the condition of the City's critical large-diameter pipeline assets. This paper will outline Pure's BWP inspection technology based on two projects in the City of Calgary and include actual results from field verifications of the electromagnetic inspection data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.577
Threshold uncertainty score0.841

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePipelines 2014Same topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207