MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095654012

Investigation into the Roles of Iranian Professors Teaching TEFL: A Study Based on Goffman's Footing Theory

2011· article· en· W2095654012 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Reza Pishghadam, Sara Shirmohammadi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of academic and applied studies · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrincipal (computer security)Ideal (ethics)ChecklistMathematics educationForeign language teachingPedagogyForeign languagePsychologySociologyLinguisticsComputer scienceEpistemologyPhilosophyCognitive psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research intends to examine the roles that professors teaching TEFL (Teaching English as a Foreign Language) at the M.A level take on based on Goffman's Footing Theory according to which speaker's role can be classified into three roles of animator, author, and principal. To this end, 218 Iranian M.A students and graduates were given a checklist comprising 21 metaphors representing three roles of animator, author, and principal in both current and ideal situations.The results of statistical analyses indicated that there is a mismatch between the roles professors take on in the current situation and the roles students prefer the professors to adopt. In the end, pedagogical implications of the research findings are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of academic and applied studiesSame topicEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningFrench-language works237,207