MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Chiral Polyurea with L-Lysinyl Residue Aimed for Optical Resolution

2013· article· en· W2095664174 on OpenAlex
Yuki Nishioka

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Membrane and Separation Technology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical chemistry methods development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyureaMembraneChemistryResidue (chemistry)MoleculeLysinePolymer chemistrySelectivityOrganic chemistryAmino acidBiochemistryPolyurethane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Novel polyurea was synthesized from lysinyl residue, L-lysine-4-nitroanilide (L-Lys-4-NA) and 1,4-phenylene diisocyanate (1,4-PDI). The polyurea thus prepared gave durable self-standing membranes. The polyurea was converted into molecular recognition materials by using Z-D-Glu or Z-L-Glu as a print molecule. The Z-D-Glu molecularly imprinted membrane adsorbed the D-isomer of Glu in preference to the corresponding L-isomer and vice versa. Even though the polyurea consisted of L-lysinyl residue, both Z-D-Glu and Z-L-Glu worked as print molecules to construct molecular (chiral) recognition sites in the membrane. Those two types of molecularly imprinted membrane show chiral separation abilities, adopting a concentration gradient or an applied potential difference as a driving force for membrane transport.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it