MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Research on the Further Role of Retired Cadres in Agricultural Research Units Under the New Situation—Case Study of Chinese Academy of Tropical Agriculture Sciences

2012· article· en· W2095688966 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shi Xueru

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Systems and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultureIdeologyPolitical scienceService (business)PoliticsEconomic growthSocial scienceSociologyBusinessGeographyMarketingEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper elaborated the importance of retired researchers play a great role in the agricultural research units under the new era, and it takes Chinese Academy of Tropical Agriculture Sciences (Hereinafter referred to as CATAS) as a example to analyze the current situation of the role and the advantages of retired researchers. Thereby, it suggests the approach of the role played by retired researchers under the new era and the effective measures for the further role of retired researchers from strengthening ideological and political construction, improving the living conditions and the level of spiritual and cultural, active aging, strengthening service management and other aspects. Key words: Retired cadres; Agricultural research units; Role

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.559
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.233
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicAgricultural Systems and PracticesFrench-language works237,207