Dissociation Between Ionic Remodeling and Ability to Sustain Atrial Fibrillation During Recovery From Experimental Congestive Heart Failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Congestive heart failure (CHF) downregulates atrial transient outward (I(to)), slow delayed rectifier (I(Ks)), and L-type Ca(2+) (I(Ca,L)) currents and upregulates Na(+)-Ca(2+) exchange current (I(NCX)) (ionic remodeling) and causes atrial fibrosis (structural remodeling). The relative importance of ionic versus structural remodeling in CHF-related atrial fibrillation (AF) is controversial. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured hemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters, mean duration of burst pacing-induced AF (DAF), and atrial-myocyte ionic currents in dogs with CHF induced by 2-week ventricular tachypacing (240 bpm), CHF dogs allowed to recover without pacing for 4 weeks (REC), and unpaced controls. Left ventricular ejection fraction averaged 58.6+/-1.2% (control), 36.2+/-2.3% (CHF, P<0.01), and 57.9+/-1.6% (REC), indicating full hemodynamic recovery. Similarly, left atrial pressures were 2.2+/-0.3 (control), 13.1+/-1.5 (CHF), and 2.4+/-0.4 (REC) mm Hg. CHF reduced I(to) density by approximately 65% (P<0.01), decreased I(Ca,L) density by approximately 50% (P<0.01), and diminished I(Ks) density by approximately 40% (P<0.01) while increasing I(NCX) density by approximately 110% (P<0.05). In REC, all ionic current densities returned to control values. DAF increased in CHF (1132+/-207 versus 14.3+/-8.8 seconds, control) and remained increased with REC (1014+/-252 seconds). Atrial fibrous tissue content also increased in CHF (2.1+/-0.2% for control versus 10.2+/-0.7% for CHF, P<0.01), with no recovery observed in REC (9.4+/-0.8%, P<0.01 versus control, P=NS versus CHF). CONCLUSIONS: With reversal of CHF, there is complete recovery of ionic remodeling, but the prolonged-AF substrate and structural remodeling remain. This suggests that structural, not ionic, remodeling is the primary contributor to AF maintenance in experimental CHF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".