Sport, Health, and Rural Community: Curling and Rural Women: A National Photovoice Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Determinants of health such as physical activity and social inclusion are key to the health of rural women, the basis of effective health promotion endeavors, and essential for rural community life. This study reports on a national curling and health study conducted with 48 rural women and girls ages 12 to 75 years in three provinces in Canada using the innovative photovoice method. Photovoice, with its inclusion of photos taken by study participants, provides a unique opportunity for pertinent data provision and comprehensive analysis by people living the experience. The purpose of the study was to examine the influence of curling on the health and community life of rural women. Study participants took pictures, recorded in log books, and participated in two group sessions to discuss the influence of curling on their health and community. Narrative and pictorial findings reveal important implications for rural women's sport participation; physical, mental, and social health; and the sustainability and development of curling and rural community life. Further research is needed to reveal the significance and address the sustainability of curling and its important contributions to rural health and rural communities. Keywords: curling, rural women, health, rural community, photovoice, Canada
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.024 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it